Comparison of Five Green Roof Treatments in Flint Michigan with Freidman’s Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Author Details

Wing Chi VincyTam, et al.

Journal Details

Published

Published: 3 February 2020 | Article Type :

Abstract

Planners and designers are interested in evaluating the metrics and statistical differences between design treatments. This study addresses categories of design treatments for a rooftop at The Sylvester Broome Empowerment Village, located in Flint, Michigan. Five design treatments: flat roof, self-design roof, extensive green roof, semi-intensive green roof, and intensive green roof, were evaluated by 36 variables chosen by the investigators. The Friedman’s Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks statistical test was applied to examine significant differences between the five treatments (p ≤ 0.05). The Friedman’s multiple comparison test revealed the treatment of the flat roof performed the poorest. There was no significant difference to demonstrate that the other four design treatments perform better than the other with the exception that the intensive green roof treatment was predicted to be significantly better than self-design rooftop (p ≤ 0.05).

Keywords: landscape architecture, environmental design, sustainability, green architecture.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

Statistics

140 Views

230 Downloads

Volume & Issue

Article Type

How to Cite

Citation:

Wing Chi VincyTam, et al.. (2020-02-03). "Comparison of Five Green Roof Treatments in Flint Michigan with Freidman’s Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks." *Volume 3*, 1, 23-36